A.I. and the figure of the Android

all right, since we have to deal with lots of androids, cyborgs, robots etc… in the next few days, let’s provide definitions. David (the protagonist of Spielberg’s A.I. Artificial Intelligence is a “mecha” android. note, this is different than “robot” or “cyborg.”

there is a decent definition of “android” on Wikipedia here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android

Maria, from “Metropolis,” Robbie the robot from “Forbidden Planet,” the “Star Wars” robots, the robot in “I Robot” are all robot:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot

different definition for the Cyborg, whose story is a bit more complicated:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyborg

Advertisements

3 Responses to “A.I. and the figure of the Android”

  1. Christine Kircos Says:

    David is an interesting protagonist to follow in AI and as a contribution to science fiction film as well. Through David the idea that lingers in many other science fiction films of what it means to be human is brought forth. David is artificially created, but with the creators intention to make him capable of love. The film seems to present the ability to love as one of the key things that separates them from human beings. David thus becomes a new kind of android that is capable to love, but also as his creator points out at the end he is able to dream and pursue those dreams, which he terms as a very human attribute. David serves as an example of an android that is able to blur the line between the difference between him and his human counterparts.

  2. Ariel Kroon Says:

    I found myself articulating the differences between cyborg/android/robot to my coworkers this summer, much to my own amusement, and as I did so, I came to realize that the lines between the three can be easily crossed and re-crossed as technology becomes more advanced: the definitions become more fluid.

    As Christine said, David is an android, but does his ability to love code him as a cyborg, then? Since he is then a fusion of android and human elements.

  3. I’d say he’s a hybrid in between the two. Just like in 2001, with Apes > humans > starchild, David represents another leap in the evolution of robots. There is a gap in between android-cyborg, and a human. I believe that David represents the bridge in between the two. However, as seen he is not a different entity between the two, but an amalgamation of them both. Something that brings him just as close to being a human, as he is to being an android or a cyborg.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: